AOR and Hard Rock
The groups, the albums, who's hot, who's not. Discuss.
6,570 topics in this forum
-
- 7 replies
- 310 views
-
- 7 replies
- 619 views
-
- 0 replies
- 234 views
-
- 73 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 285 views
-
- 36 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 11 replies
- 276 views
-
- 1 reply
- 299 views
-
- 10 replies
- 858 views
-
- 4 replies
- 256 views
-
- 31 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 241 views
-
- 7 replies
- 185 views
-
- 37 replies
- 754 views
-
- 16 replies
- 395 views
-
- 29 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 356 views
-
- 4 replies
- 445 views
-
- 18 replies
- 314 views
-
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
- 6 replies
- 457 views
-
- 8 replies
- 327 views
-
- 67 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 229 views
-
Who's Online (See full list)
-
Posts
-
My two cents... This site's database was probably the single biggest factor in me getting into the AOR/melodic rock subgenre, and I was like a kid in a candy shop for a while because I knew *almost* every artist on here would appeal to me and fit what I was looking for. Finding new music you enjoy is one of life's greatest pleasures and for a while this site was my go-to. I'll always be grateful to Dan and the rest of the contributors for that. That being said, I worry that it will lose a lot of that appeal if it just starts adding a bunch of artists that play rock music but do not fit in the AOR/melodic rock subgenre. There are a few bands on here that are already pushing it and if every artist with two guitars and a big snare drum gets admitted, what's separating this database from any other? We are all fans of a type of music that is quite "niche" these days but that's what makes the site special. tl;dr I vote no on all of them. I vote no on Creed twice. -
By Captain Howdy · Posted
There is always gonna be a fine line between what is an is not gonna cut the mustard on here. As I said before, Cornell is an amazing singer and the stuff he did with Audioslave was certainly deserving of a place on the site as there was so much 70s hard rock/metal to their sound. But Soundgarden certainly does not fit beyond a few songs here and there. And his solo stuff is all over the place genre wise. His James Bond theme, you know my name is one of my favourite hard rock songs of all time and if he had released a whole album in that style, I would whole heartedly support that being on the site, but as much as I really like his Carry on album, it just does not belong here. And I would be really against stuff like Pearl Jam and Creed not because I flat out hate them, but just because I don't think they really fit. There are bands I love I would not want on here, and there are bands I hate who I fully support them being on here (The Darkness for example). The other thing to consider, as it was mentioned by someone, it does not matter if certain members of a band have albums on here, that does not mean there other bands belong on here. Audioslave yes, Soundgarden and RATM, no. Scott Stapp (can't really comment) but Creed, no. Mother Love Bone, yes. Pearl Jam, no. And with some of the other bands mentioned, like The Cars. It's a slippery slope, as where do you stop? Should Dire Straits be on here? Bruce Springsteen? Huey Lewis? Mellencamp? All artists I really like, but don't think they have a place. -
By Captain Howdy · Posted
Really looking forward to a couple of upcoming releases as well. Maverick is sounding promising, and most hyped for The Warning as all singles released from that so far have been top notch. Plus there is the new Rolling Quartz EP on the horizon. -
While I enjoy listening to some of those bands, I'd vote no on including any in the HH main database. Especially the ones I'd classify as grunge (Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Soundgarden and Mudhoney) or alternative rock (Live and Collective Soul) as for me those are the antithesis of what I consider a HH artist to be. -
By Captain Howdy · Posted
Might be a bit obvious, and there are so many songs with this name, but these are my faves
-
