Jump to content

Not the same site anymore


Nelson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was very surprised to see the name Bonnie Tyler (see topic under this) here and really got me thinking that this is not the same Heavy Harmonies anymore.

 

This is not to say that I oppose the inclusion of artists like Ms. Tyler. I don't have that much knowledge of what are the boundaries of melodic rock or where or when you start labeling an artist as AOR. Seeing names like Chicago, Bonnie Tyler and Kenny Rogers Jr. just give me the feeling that this is not the same site that I was very excited to go to. Of course, with the discovery of long-forgotten recordings, names and titles will keep adding up but can you imagine seeing those names in this site six years ago?

 

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon we should weild the axe ona heap of the acts getting included on HH.

Or drop "heavy" from the title and just call it "harmonies".

 

Sure, not everything on the main site is "heavy", but those that aren't heavy atelast have their roots in from the rock era of the 80's.

For example, ... Bon Jovi once a hard rock band, now just a radio rock band would still qualify based on their past, but a band never having had any ties with the hard/melodic/glam rock scene should not appear.

 

Just my 2c.

 

 

BTW, did you read what the Bonnie Tyler thread was about?

This exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

My $0.02 (which is worth so much less than even Canada these days... ):

 

Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record) there have been conversations about what's right/wrong for inclusion. Some I agree with, some not, but because the vast majority has always been, and continues to be what I think is a good fit I'm not going anywhere. In my opinion not all that much has changed here other than the people frequenting the boards, and they continue to be good people (except Wes) so I continue to stick around.

 

To me this site continues to be the best, most user friendly and although not complete free of internal politics, it's for damn sure closer than any of the "other" sites.

 

In short I like it here. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
My $0.02 (which is worth so much less than even Canada these days... ):

 

and they continue to be good people (except Wes) so I continue to stick around.

 

 

:axe:

Oops, I didn't realise I actually typed that, I thought I was just thinking it.... :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was very surprised to see the name Bonnie Tyler (see topic under this) here and really got me thinking that this is not the same Heavy Harmonies anymore.

 

This is not to say that I oppose the inclusion of artists like Ms. Tyler. I don't have that much knowledge of what are the boundaries of melodic rock or where or when you start labeling an artist as AOR. Seeing names like Chicago, Bonnie Tyler and Kenny Rogers Jr. just give me the feeling that this is not the same site that I was very excited to go to. Of course, with the discovery of long-forgotten recordings, names and titles will keep adding up but can you imagine seeing those names in this site six years ago?

 

Just a thought.

 

Now is better :headbanger:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is there are two kinds of music...good and bad... although I'm a DIE HARD

Metalhead,I also love Blues, 60's Rock, some 80's New wave, 70's Punk Rock etc.

As long as we don't include RAP...I'm fine..and for the record I do like Some Rap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must admit that there are a few bands/musicians included on HH that make me shake my head but there's no way you're gonna have unanimous agreement on a topic like this so as long as the Bonnie Tylers of the world don't take over the site...it's no big deal....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is there are two kinds of music...good and bad... although I'm a DIE HARD

Metalhead,I also love Blues, 60's Rock, some 80's New wave, 70's Punk Rock etc.

As long as we don't include RAP...I'm fine..and for the record I do like Some Rap...

 

Don't try and fool us aM1966. When I came into your office the other day I heard Tupac blasting from your CD player. And then the next day you were listening to 50 cent. I know you tried to switch it to Shadows Fall in the attempt that your "keeping it metal." But I'm onto you you closet rap fan!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
My feeling is there are two kinds of music...good and bad... although I'm a DIE HARD

Metalhead,I also love Blues, 60's Rock, some 80's New wave, 70's Punk Rock etc.

As long as we don't include RAP...I'm fine..and for the record I do like Some Rap...

 

Don't try and fool us aM1966. When I came into your office the other day I heard Tupac blasting from your CD player. And then the next day you were listening to 50 cent. I know you tried to switch it to Shadows Fall in the attempt that your "keeping it metal." But I'm onto you you closet rap fan!

I won't even bore you with the constant PM's I get from him trying to get me to listen to Snoop Dogg. Supposedly it's the shiznit... :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is there are two kinds of music...good and bad... although I'm a DIE HARD

Metalhead,I also love Blues, 60's Rock, some 80's New wave, 70's Punk Rock etc.

As long as we don't include RAP...I'm fine..and for the record I do like Some Rap...

 

Don't try and fool us aM1966. When I came into your office the other day I heard Tupac blasting from your CD player. And then the next day you were listening to 50 cent. I know you tried to switch it to Shadows Fall in the attempt that your "keeping it metal." But I'm onto you you closet rap fan!

 

 

My feeling is there are two kinds of music...good and bad... although I'm a DIE HARD

Metalhead,I also love Blues, 60's Rock, some 80's New wave, 70's Punk Rock etc.

As long as we don't include RAP...I'm fine..and for the record I do like Some Rap...

 

Don't try and fool us aM1966. When I came into your office the other day I heard Tupac blasting from your CD player. And then the next day you were listening to 50 cent. I know you tried to switch it to Shadows Fall in the attempt that your "keeping it metal." But I'm onto you you closet rap fan!

I won't even bore you with the constant PM's I get from him trying to get me to listen to Snoop Dogg. Supposedly it's the shiznit... :blink:

Sho nuff my brandnewbian bruthas...Peep dis though..I's be gettin yo CD's

Back to ya so quit trippin..London don't ever try and slip those Backstreet Boys

CD's by me again...I told you I hate those types of bands..Pete...Same for you..

:rofl2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is HH the same as it was 6 yrs. ago? No.

 

Are there bands/artists listed here that don't belong? Yes.

 

Is it possible to have unanimous agreement on this subject? No.

 

Is this still the greatest melodic rock site on the web? Yes.

 

Do I wish Pete wasn't here? Uh, no comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2021 Gold Donors

I've been viewing the main site for about 3-4 years and have been a member of the forum for over 2 years now. I've seen changes in that 2 years but I still love this place. I don't like evrything that gets put on this board but there is some stuff that I never heard of and see it for sale. Often times it is described as great 80's AOR, MHR, glam, etc or even comparing them a band from our genre. Seeing some of the comments about what these artist really sound like on this site has help me eliminate from picking up some shit that people try pawning off using our genre. So as far as I concerned, it may be questionable weather or not it should be on here but it has helped me from wasting my hard earned cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I wish Pete wasn't here? Uh, no comment.

Yeah, same for me. It's hard to put into words just how much I value his presence here. :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record)

 

Just curious... who was member #1? I notice that Dan himself is member #2, and he founded this site!! :unsure:

 

Side note: huh huh... we said "member." Huh huh huh huh....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record)

 

Just curious... who was member #1? I notice that Dan himself is member #2, and he founded this site!! :unsure:

 

Side note: huh huh... we said "member." Huh huh huh huh....

Excellent question... Dan, is there a way to tell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record)

 

Just curious... who was member #1? I notice that Dan himself is member #2, and he founded this site!! :unsure:

 

Side note: huh huh... we said "member." Huh huh huh huh....

Excellent question... Dan, is there a way to tell?

 

The question "if Dan is #2, who was #1?" has been bugging the hell outta me ever since I first noticed it, but I never found the right opportunity to ask ... :banana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record)

 

Just curious... who was member #1? I notice that Dan himself is member #2, and he founded this site!! :unsure:

 

Side note: huh huh... we said "member." Huh huh huh huh....

Excellent question... Dan, is there a way to tell?

Ask Mr Owl..he knows how many licks it takes to get to the tootsie roll

center of a tootsie pop..so he should know. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record)

 

Just curious... who was member #1? I notice that Dan himself is member #2, and he founded this site!! :unsure:

 

Side note: huh huh... we said "member." Huh huh huh huh....

Excellent question... Dan, is there a way to tell?

Ask Mr Owl..he knows how many licks it takes to get to the tootsie roll

center of a tootsie pop..so he should know. :wacko:

Unrelated: I have been eating those like crazy lately... :anon:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since I've been a member (and I am member #19 for the record)

 

Just curious... who was member #1? I notice that Dan himself is member #2, and he founded this site!! :unsure:

 

Side note: huh huh... we said "member." Huh huh huh huh....

Excellent question... Dan, is there a way to tell?

Ask Mr Owl..he knows how many licks it takes to get to the tootsie roll

center of a tootsie pop..so he should know. :wacko:

Unrelated: I have been eating those like crazy lately... :anon:

 

In that case, we'll call you "Kojak" from now on. Who loves ya baby?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, i'm going to add my .02 cents. What makes me say to myself....WTF, how can bands like Sacred warrior, Angelica, Holy Soldier, Stryper, Bloodgood and bands alike be in both HH and in Heaven's Metal? But bands like Judas Priest, Obsession, Malice, Artch, Feinstein and bands just a similar not be in HH. I think....and this is my opinion....an alignment is in order! Or just combine the other two to make one large database. Which leads to this question, how many here in HH are actually going to the other two sites and how often or maybe Dan can answer this..... how many hits per day do the other sites receive? It's a hell alot easier to do a search when ALL of the bands are listed in one database. Wow...i feel better. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, i'm going to add my .02 cents. What makes me say to myself....WTF, how can bands like Sacred warrior, Angelica, Holy Soldier, Stryper, Bloodgood and bands alike be in both HH and in Heaven's Metal? But bands like Judas Priest, Obsession, Malice, Artch, Feinstein and bands just a similar not be in HH. I think....and this is my opinion....an alignment is in order! Or just combine the other two to make one large database.

 

Good idea. Dan could call it "Heavenly Brutal Harmonious Metal-n-Stuff" or something like that. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

www.music-n-shit.com

 

HH/BM/HM used to be one large database/site, but then more and more bands started appearing on the fringe of what HH was about and that was when I split the sites.

 

If people are complaining about Bonnie Tyler being on HH, methinks they might complain just a wee bit about Emperor or Marduk being included...

 

-Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Posts

    • Sainted Sinners - On and On  
    • I try to give albums a proper go before I write them off. Closest I would say would be cats In Space Atlantis. Narnia was SO good that my expectations were extremely high and the album was average on first couple of listens. I let it go for a few months, then came back to it with anopen mind and loved it. Otherwise I can probably pick songs. God Of Thunder I didn't like for many many years and eventually it grew on me.  
    • I left this comment on the promo for "Flames," and I feel like it applies to every song I've heard from this project so far, too:  "Great song, great singer, but I feel like the compression of the production takes away from the quality of the songwriting and puts a damper on Ken's playing."
    • Vain, yes it's one band i never really got into it. Just last week I spent about 30 mins listening to their most popular songs, I dont know what it is but the songs dont do much for me. But i do like one of their songs a lot 'No tears for you', and Whisper is pretty good too. And a few I do like to some degree, that's about it. 
    • Listening to it now (I know I'm late)... Some starter notes, that have no doubt been mentioned here already, but I didn't read through the whole thread: -Production is overdone. I don't know why, when Tobias Lindell had done such a masterful job mixing their last few records, he would do this?  -I've always liked H.E.A.T better with Kenny than with Erik. Not because I think Kenny is a better singer by any stretch (though I do think Kenny's voice is underrated when comparisons of the two inevitably arise), but for the same reason I prefer Danger Danger with Ted Poley to Paul Laine. Kenny's voice is, to me, part of the sound of H.E.A.T and I felt like it was missing the longer Erik was the vocalist with the band, even though 3/4 of the records they did with him were phenomenal. -For the first time, I feel like H.E.A.T doesn't know where they're going. On previous records, there was a distinct direction they were clearly striving for -- the original self-titled album and Freedom Rock were clearly products of their influences and the albums that followed with Erik Gronwall showed the growth and maturity of their playing, songwriting and the budding production skills of Jonah Tee. But I can't figure out if Force Majeure is meant to be a step forward or a step back. I wouldn't go so far as to say that any of the songs are bad, but there's not a single banger present here, as far as I'm concerned, which I was not expecting. -I also feel like this is the first time you can really hear Eric Rivers's absence since he left the band after Tearing Down the Walls. Into the Great Unknown being an anomaly altogether guitar wise and H.E.A.T II being a phenomenal return to the stage for Dave Dalone, Force Majeure is the first time I've really thought to myself, "Man, there could really be another guitar track here," which might be why they felt the need to compensate with the over-the-top production?   All in all, is it bad? No, I wouldn't go that far. But as far as H.E.A.T albums go, it falls extremely short of the ridiculously high standard they've set for themselves over the course of their career.   But hey, it's better than Into the Great Unknown.
    • Yeah, a few times. Unfortunately, it didn't live up to all the hype. 
    • Ok the title was clickbait, first dislike and then later like would be more accurate but hey, you clicked on the topic, so it worked! 😬
    • As a few others mentioned, musically it isn't too far off from their early material, but the song itself doesn't do much for me unfortunately.   In watching the video it looks like they've got a new drummer.
    • White Lion's Big Game was a massive letdown after Pride but over the years it's grown on me. Cinderella's Heartbreak Station was always way too bluesy and too far removed from the debut but again the quality of the songs sunk in after about 15 years. Spread Eagle's Open To The Public was a bit of a letdown compared to the debut but there's enough strong stuff on it once it gets under your skin to enjoy it. Whitesnake's Slip of the Tongue was another real letdown post 1987. Vai didn't do the songs any favours but again there's a pretty good collection of songs once I got over my disappointment. Anything by Harem Scarem after the debut. Still there best for me by a long shot but heaps of solid albums in the mix. Shotgun Messiahs 3rd industrial album. On first listen wtf but songs are fkn awesome. Same goes with  Wasp's KFD.
    • I've mentioned it before, but I wasn't in love with either Roxx Gang's 'Things you've never done before' or Vain's 'No Respect' when I first heard them. That was in the early stages, though. Vain's in one of my top 10 albums and I love the Roxx Gang one too, so things certainly changed.  Neither are exactly my favourite albums ever, but Cinderella's 'Heartbreak station' and Warrant's 'Ultraphobic' both took a long while for me to come around on. I actually returned the Cinderella CD when I bought that one, and only re-purchased it second hand many years later. Still don't love it, but dislike it less, lol.  To answer Karpetface's question, not to the degree of hatred, but back in the day when all I ever had were CDs and cassettes and once they were bought they were bought, I tended to give everything a lot more chances than I would today, where music consumption is the polar opposite. When I only had dozens, or up until it was a couple of hundred albums... the time to give something a chance again seemed to come around a lot more often than these days, when there's a million songs to choose from all the time. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.