Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
PeterS

What will become of our music in 100 years?

Recommended Posts

I take part in a Music quiz in Munich. Almost everybody who takes part is younger and it's an extremely broad set of tastes. 
 

Last week I ran the quiz. We all take turns to run it. I threw LA Guns, Rip and Tear, in there based on it was the second most viewed on youtube after Ballad of Jane by them .  Not a single person got the band or song. 

It struck me that most of our music may well just fade away. A few will pick it up and enjoy it but it'll be a real niche. Those crazy dudes back in the 1980s. 

Perhaps the big hitters will still be know. Def Leppard's come up and people knew it but anything out of the mega hits seems to be gone already. 

Kind of sad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair Rip And Tear is a pretty average song.

I still don't 'get it' as much as som eo their other songs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the whole quiz based on listens on Spotify or views on Youtube to try and make sure people knew stuff.  Nothing under a million plays. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There will still be hard rock and metal in 100 years...will it sound like the 80's....nope...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, PeterS said:

I take part in a Music quiz in Munich. Almost everybody who takes part is younger and it's an extremely broad set of tastes. 
 

Last week I ran the quiz. We all take turns to run it. I threw LA Guns, Rip and Tear, in there based on it was the second most viewed on youtube after Ballad of Jane by them .  Not a single person got the band or song. 

It struck me that most of our music may well just fade away. A few will pick it up and enjoy it but it'll be a real niche. Those crazy dudes back in the 1980s. 

Perhaps the big hitters will still be know. Def Leppard's come up and people knew it but anything out of the mega hits seems to be gone already. 

Kind of sad. 

It is a bit sad, but not surprising.  When I've played or watched music trivia games I often draw blanks when it comes to different eras & genres.  But with all the info available online, streaming services and forums like this, hopefully 80's hard rock/metal, and not just the most popular artists, will retain some interest and find new fans for at least a few more decades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We won't even be alive in that tme frome lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not surprised at all. There's probably only a pretty tiny handful of stuff from that era that would really be recognisable at all to the average person. 

A bunch of Bon Jovi, Gn'R & Van Halen songs, 'Pour some sugar on me' and 'Love Bites' from Def Leppard, 'Is this love' from Whitesnake - maybe 'Here I go again' to some real "music experts." 'The flame' by Cheap Trick. 'To be with you' and 'More than words.' 'Every rose has it's thorn' and maybe 'Nothin' but a good time' at a stretch from Poison. 'Cherry Pie.' 

And I reckon that'd be close to it. I guess stuff from the Metallica 'Black' album if you want to include that. 'Winds of change' by Scorpions?

But yeah, I don't think it'd be much more than that. Stuff like LA Guns, or Ratt and that entire second tier "successful" group of bands from the era just aren't known at all to anyone who's not actually into the scene. Well that's been my experience anyway. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't name much....or any....music from 100 years ago.  

It's like anything I guess....Time change, people change.

I do think things will have a better chance of surviving though with the digital media.  And I also think music has evolved so much that I'm not sure how much more it can evolve.  

I won't be here so it won't much be mattering to me at that point :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to expect anyone to recognise Rip & Tear or any other LA Guns song is a bit optimistic lol.

Most classic rock people would get - you know the stuff which is on Dads driving rock cds ;)

But that's about it.

as to where our music will be in 100 years? Well metal was born in the 70s which is say 50 yrs ago now so there is a reasonable chance rock will still be about in some form. 

depends on whether we can refrain from destroying the planet or ourselves before then :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Posts

    • No doubt in the world he has a sound and he doesn't stray far from it... but if it's that good I'm prepared to be lenient here,
    • Also, the boulevard album is near perfection except the 1 minute of madness at the end of Slippin Away. What were they thinking??  Might be my most played album of 2017. More accurately would no 2 spot. really looking forward to seeing them again on Saturday 
    • Yeah, I love the original.
      Interestingly, Sly Stallone wanted "Another One Bites The Dust" and Queen wouldn't allow the ise, so he asked Survivor to write their version of the Queen song.
      The watched some of the movies and saw the line "you've lost the eye of the tiger", liked the line and wrote the song.
      Another footnote, for the next movie they were presented with that "you're the best... around" song and rejected it and it went on the get fame in the Karate Kid movie. Anyway, like I said, I love the original song, but to me it sounds a bit rawer than this version.
      This version doesn't suck, it's just average in the way of "what's the point"
      Nothing new, no new take on the song.
      if you're gonna redo a song like this, it has to be (as Paul Stanley would say) bombastic.
      This isn't.

      No biggie, but of all the covers are lesser versions of the originals I'll obviously have no interest.
      To cover a song you either improve it or do your own take on it.
      Simply re-recording it with newer technology and a cleaner sound etc is not very inspiring.
    • Not sure what you mean by that. You reckon this version is more AOR than the original? Bonfire are by nature a bit ballsier than Survivor in that era and this just sounds like Bonfire doing a Survivor cover, which, by nature, is a bit more hard rock than AOR... to these ears anyway. Decent cover. 
    • Why are the making the songs more AOR than the originals? Very average.
    • Ha true..his songs are pretty much one dimensional but...two different songs so the melodies do vary(though very slightly) and the second one happens to sound better to these ears.
    • Released via Reed's own 'Zero One Entertainment' label. 
    • Eye of the Tiger cover  
    • I don't think Frontiers is involved with this one
    • True they have been known for long delays between releases.  But over a similar 15 year span from '84 -'99 they put out 4 albums vs. 2.  And after Pyromania & Hysteria a delay was understandable following up hugely successful records (with long tours), Rick Allen lost his arm and had to relearn how to play, they scrapped recordings and started over with a different producer, and of course Steve's struggles with depression and alcohol eventually leading to his death while working on Adrenalize
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.