Jump to content

Disney Buys Marvel Comics

Fat Freddy

Recommended Posts

This is pretty huge news in the Geek world. Marvel Comics is now a subsidiary of the House of Mouse. Imagine the crossover possibilities!! I can't wait for "High School Musical 4: Hannah Montana Vs. the Punisher" :rofl:




LOS ANGELES — In a deal that redraws Hollywood’s architecture, the Walt Disney Company said on Monday that it would acquire Spider-Man and his Marvel Entertainment cohort for $4 billion.


Can Disney expand Marvel's reach without damaging the comic book company's brand?


Disney will pay about 60 percent cash and 40 percent stock to acquire Marvel, the comic book giant whose stable of 5,000 characters includes some of the world’s best-known superheroes: Iron Man, the X-Men, the Fantastic Four, Captain America and Thor.


Marvel has aggressively exploited its most popular characters through motion pictures, video games and consumer products. But Disney sees an opportunity to plug Marvel into its vaunted marketing and distribution system.


Almost immediately, for instance, Marvel characters will pop up at Disney’s theme parks in Paris and Hong Kong. Disney’s cable television channels will showcase Marvel, while consumer products could be an enormous area of growth, particularly overseas where the comics company has struggled to make inroads.


“Marvel’s brand and its treasure trove of content will now benefit from our extraordinary reach,” Robert A. Iger, Disney’s chief executive, said in an interview. “We paid a price that reflects the value they’ve created and the value we can create as one company. It’s a full price, but a fair price.”


The surprise acquisition points to the film industry’s biggest issue at the moment: access to capital. Those who have it are finding opportunity; those who do not may be left behind.


Marvel had tried to finance its films with the help of $525 million in slate financing, but found it impossible on “Iron Man” and “Hulk” to meet a condition that required it to raise a third of its cash by selling overseas distribution rights. To get around the requirement, Marvel told investors in May that it would self-finance a third of each film — something that would be much easier with Disney’s muscle behind it.


The deal instantly makes Disney a partner with Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment and 20th Century Fox, all of which have long-term deals to make or distribute movies based on Marvel characters. Coming are new entries in Sony’s “Spider-Man” franchise and Fox’s “X-Men” series.


Over the long haul, Paramount has the most to lose, as Disney works Marvel into its system. Only last September, Paramount, a unit of Viacom, announced an agreement to distribute five Marvel films, including two “Iron Man” sequels, over several years.


Disney said it would honor Marvel’s studio contracts, but the goal was clearly to bring “Iron Man” and others in-house over time.


“We believe Viacom is unlikely to retain distribution rights to Marvel films after the agreement,” Michael C. Morris, a UBS analyst, wrote in a research note.


A Paramount’s spokeswoman had no immediate comment, other than to point toward Mr. Iger’s assurances that he would honor its terms. A spokesman for Fox did not immediately respond to a query. A Sony spokesman said, “Our deal is not affected.”


Marvel’s traditionally strong contractual position on its various projects will probably give Disney considerable ability to affect progress on and timing of various films, creating a potential headaches for studios for years to come; rivals will be trying to build schedules around movies on which Disney now has input.


As Disney’s own live-action film schedule becomes more robust, the studio may find its new partnerships and agendas bumping into each other. Only last month, Disney’s new partners from DreamWorks found themselves assuring the company that plans to develop a film based on Michael Crichton’s novel “Pirate Latitudes” would steer clear of any conflict with Disney’s plans for a fourth “Pirates of the Caribbean” movie.


Marvel’s intellectual property tends to be more popular with boys — an area where Disney could use help. While the likes of “Hannah Montana” and the blockbuster Princesses merchandising line have solidified Disney’s hold on little girls, franchises for boys have been harder to come by.


Disney XD, a new cable channel aimed at boys, already licenses 20 hours of programming a week from Marvel. As Disney seeks to expand that channel, particularly overseas, Marvel will play an even greater role.


The acquisition, which has been approved by the boards of both companies but still must be approved by Marvel shareholders, got mixed marks on Wall Street. While most analysts applauded the move as bold and strategically sound, some analysts questioned the price as too steep. Disney shares fell 3 percent in afternoon trading. Marvel shares were up 25 percent.


One question is whether Marvel’s lesser-known characters can be developed into blockbusters — à la Iron Man — and how much movie muscle the library’s most valuable assets — like Spider-Man and the X-Men — have left. The declining DVD market is also a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disney is known for their censorship. It will be interesting to see if they try to "tone down" certain titles...

That's what I was wondering. The Marvel MAX (mature) line has some great titles in it (i.e. The Punisher Max series, Terror Inc, Foolkiller, Zombie, etc.). Don't mess with success people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a huge fan of Marvel but i did like Blaze of Glory, Ghost Rider, Daredevil, Iron Man and a couple of others...however i HATE Disney


so i probably wont bother picking up anymore Marvel titles knowing how watered downand cheap the Disney crap is these days -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a huge fan of Marvel but i did like Blaze of Glory, Ghost Rider, Daredevil, Iron Man and a couple of others...however i HATE Disney


so i probably wont bother picking up anymore Marvel titles knowing how watered downand cheap the Disney crap is these days -_-


Ghost Rider is without a doubt one of the worse films I've ever had the misfortune to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • His music videos are always good: either very silly, or very sexy. So I've got this queued up on the PC. Looking forward to it. 
    • New single "The Animal" dropped today, not bad at all:    
    • I dig the new tune!  Honestly, might be my favorite yet from these guys. I like that this kind of gets away from the  Bon Jovi Country vibe they sometimes had on the debut.  For me, this has a fresh, big sound to it.   Will have the new one on my radar.
    • 3rd single... Love It   
    • New video for 'Dance'.    
    • Vandenberg - Sin Chicago - The Chicago Story (2 CD) Megadeth - So Far, So Good, So What? (Expanded) The Allman Betts Band - Down to the River Mike Oldfield - Five Miles Out (Remaster) Buckingham & McVie - S/T Michael Hutchence - S/T Roxy Music - Stranded (Remaster) Echo & the Bunnymen - Reverberation  Echo & the Bunnymen - Evergreen (Expanded)
    • After releasing two albums with AOR/Melodic Rock band Streets, ”1st” (1983) and ”Crimes In Mind” (1985), lead singer and keyboardist Steve Walsh returned to Kansas, to revive the band along with original members Phil Ehart (drums) and Rich Williams (Guitar). Furthermore, the lineup was completed by the addition of bassist Billy Greer (from Streets) and young, promising, former Dixie Dregs guitar man Steve Morse, who also contributed with composing skills and backing vocals. Eventually, the group’s ”Power” album was released in November of 1986, rather much to the vintage Kansas and Prog Rock purists dismissal, as I recall it. The heavier sound/direction and absence of violinist Robby Steinhardt, songwriter/keyboardist/guitarist Kerry Livgren and bassist Dave Hope were all contributing factors to the disapproval, it seems. However, mentioned ”Power” should perhaps instead be judged on its own merits, as it is what it is. Put out in a time when commercial Melodic Hardrock was very much in fashion, with FM rock radio and MTV as ever the important ingredients of daily life. In the end, the album actually landed at a respectable No. 35 on the Billboard chart, while the single/ballad ”All I Wanted” eventually rose to an even more impressive No. 19. Review by Thomas McFapperson 2024.        
    • They have a real knack for writing (and producing!) songs that could be featured in '80s coming of age films and I mean that in the most complimentary way possible. Really putting the retro in retrowave 
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.