Jump to content

Anybody into Trigger?


bangerdave
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is anybody into this band?I'm curious as i was reading a review and it said if you like Starz and Angel you should really dig this band.Love to hear your opinions guys.

 

:unsure: I hope this is the Trigger you are talking about !!!!!

 

If so, this might help you out Dave with some samples and info :tumbsup:

 

CD Baby - Trigger

 

Trigger Website

 

I see the new CD is actually a CD-R again....This is begining to happen rather often now it seems !!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Starz and Angel...a hell of a lot, but the Trigger doesn't quite do it for me even though it came out during a period when I thought there was some stellar bands around.

 

This might be because of a few personal factors as many, many folks love it.

 

Now whereas I grew up listening to Starz and Angel (plus Aerosmith, Godz, Legs Diamond, 1994 e.t.c. you get the idea ... 70's U.S. rock generally) I didn't hear Trigger properly until the CD release (apart from a mate who had it and played it to death everytime I went around, and even did me a tape of it at some point), so it sounds a little dated to me.

But then again albums I think still sound excellent from that time that I grew up with, again that phrase, and get me rocking other people think sound dated...maybe because they heard them for the first time quite siome time after they were released, which could be the case with me and the Trigger.

 

Now although that my buddy loved it and I heard a reasonable amount of it back then, the fact I still chose not to pick it up at the time kind of points out that even though I generally heard it "2nd hand" as it were I was never moved enough to buy myself a copy, which I would do if I heard an album I liked, and at the time I remember wondering what he liked so much about it.

 

Fast forward to the CD release, and with the passage of years a kind of legendary status was imposed upon the album, so I thought check it out as lots of albums I didn't like when younger I find I like now (the old mellowing out syndrome???? arrrgghhh!)

But still I just can't find anything astounding about it although many see it as a classic, and maybe because of it's quasi legendary status I ended up being disappointed when I finally got around to listening to it properly. It's okay and has it's moments but the vocals do get on my nerves on ocassion, and in parts it sounds so much like Kiss that you might as well buy the real thing.

 

Now someone like Jez will come along and poo poo my statements :lol: Nah...I know Jez likes it a lot so I'd take on board his view too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me now thinks we might be talking about another Trigger here :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a little late coming to the party on the Trigger album aswell. I probably first heard it mid 80's I reckon and on first opinion, like Nick, it sort of washed over me somewhat. I could see what people meant, giving the Starz and Angel comparisons, but again , as Nick also states, I heard more of a Kiss vibe going on than anything else and on first inspection, it was nowhere near to those bands. I didn't hear it again until someone gave me a link to download the vinyl and it is since then that I really have got into it.

 

I virtually forgot I dl'd it and it wasn't until I had my ipod on mix and the Trigger songs kept coming up all the time that I started to really take notice. Finally I got around to playing the full album about 4 years ago and since then I play it all the time. Absolutely love it, and although I still say it is nowhere near as good as Angel or Starz, some of the songs are definitely on par with Kiss in quality. I certainly wouldn't call it a Classic' as it clearly isn't, but I can understand why it got some of it's 'Legendary' status, as it was one of those discs that apart from certain people in the know, sunk pretty quickly, not to be spoken of that much since, except in a few quarters. Thankfully Rock Candy did a brilliant job on the re-issue and now it is avaliable for everyone to hear and I definitely recommend anyone into their mid/late 70's US hard Rock to check it out, as It definitely deserves it place in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a little late coming to the party on the Trigger album aswell. I probably first heard it mid 80's I reckon and on first opinion, like Nick, it sort of washed over me somewhat. I could see what people meant, giving the Starz and Angel comparisons, but again , as Nick also states, I heard more of a Kiss vibe going on than anything else and on first inspection, it was nowhere near to those bands. I didn't hear it again until someone gave me a link to download the vinyl and it is since then that I really have got into it.

 

I virtually forgot I dl'd it and it wasn't until I had my ipod on mix and the Trigger songs kept coming up all the time that I started to really take notice. Finally I got around to playing the full album about 4 years ago and since then I play it all the time. Absolutely love it, and although I still say it is nowhere near as good as Angel or Starz, some of the songs are definitely on par with Kiss in quality. I certainly wouldn't call it a Classic' as it clearly isn't, but I can understand why it got some of it's 'Legendary' status, as it was one of those discs that apart from certain people in the know, sunk pretty quickly, not to be spoken of that much since, except in a few quarters. Thankfully Rock Candy did a brilliant job on the re-issue and now it is avaliable for everyone to hear and I definitely recommend anyone into their mid/late 70's US hard Rock to check it out, as It definitely deserves it place in there.

Cheers Jez,this is one cd i will take a risk on and pick up and thank's to Nickc and Dave for their advice. :tumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big Starz (rule!), Angel and Kiss fan so I grabbed this on Rock Candy right when it came out. Much like Jez when he first heard it, it sorta fell by the wayside with me. I liked it but nothing too gripping. That said, I feel I haven't given it a proper chance to win me over. I'll give it multiple spins before I voice a concrete opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two separate bands mate.

 

The NJ band from the 70's had their debut reissued on ROCK CANDY RECORDS and it's not a cdr.

Here is the cover:

 

 

Trigger20.jpg

 

 

Saw them at their reunion gig over the summer. Very good 70's rock. :tumbsup:

Yeah mate that's the band and i love my 70's hard rock so i will check it out. :tumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Two separate bands mate.

 

The NJ band from the 70's had their debut reissued on ROCK CANDY RECORDS and it's not a cdr.

Here is the cover:

 

 

Trigger20.jpg

 

 

Saw them at their reunion gig over the summer. Very good 70's rock. :tumbsup:

Yeah mate that's the band and i love my 70's hard rock so i will check it out. :tumbsup:

 

i used to have the lp and it was worth picking up the cd to hear it again after all these years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the only "Trigger" I'm familiar with:

 

trigger400.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rofl: Your killing me man. :lol:

 

Somebody's gotta take over the "random cheap joke" position that's been vacant since JustJason disappeared. Might as well be me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • 2021 HH Donation Drive

    Please support Heavy Harmonies! The donations goal is the out-of-pocket expenses to run the main site and this board for calendar year 2021.



    78% of donation goal reached.
    Donate Sidebar by DevFuse
  • Posts

    • It's like how I apologise to the mechanics every time my car breaks down.
    • I reckon it's worth asking the question. 
    • I come in genuine curiosity, but this hospital argument... I'd like clarification. So originally we couldn't do anything because covid was going to kill everyone on earth. Then there was a vaccine and we couldn't do anything until we all got vaccinated. Now we're all vaccinated and the sole reason left that we're still living piece of shit lives is because we don't want to overload the hospitals? Is this the correct read on it? So, if this is true, we've resigned to the truth that is this is how the rest of our lives look? Masks, QR codes, crowd capacities, covid tests if we want to travel interstate, let alone international travel - then we need 87 tests and quarantine every time a new variant pops up, which will be fortnightly, or at the latest, monthly. This is it now, is it? Because if it's not, how does the end of it look? When will it be okay to live again without fear of clogging up the hospitals?  I can only speak for Australia on this part of it, but all we've ever heard about is stopping the strain on the hospitals, but has anyone ever seen it? Would anyone even consider overloaded hospitals as an issue if the media hadn't told us it was an issue? I ask as anyone I know who works in healthcare, and to an extent, even myself, as a medical courier who has worked every single day of the last two years... no one I know, or I, have ever seen any single even remote sign of all this strain on our health system. So, like the rest of this pandemic, is it just another media beat up? All they've done for two years straight is belt fear into us, so is it unreasonable to think this is just another branch from that tree? I'm just sick of daily excuses why our lives are still fucking horrible. Anytime the mere suggestion of return to a "normal" life gets brought up, there's a whole list of media-inspired reasons why we have to continue living in misery.  Anyway, I think that was about it. I'm just in eternal wonder about why we all had to get vaccinated when it hasn't actually changed anything about how covid is viewed and feared. Covid is viewed exactly as it was two years ago. It still governs every aspect of how we live, so all these promises about getting vaccinated so we could go back to a normal life were obviously all bullshit.  I was thinking about Australia's trajectory this morning. So if we keep up this pathetic excuse for an existence - the daily covid rate is around 1300 daily cases - let's call it 1500 daily cases if and when the other states open up. So if we continue on this trajectory, living in paralysed fear of the virus, acting like every case of covid is terminal cancer, we should get past this covid thing in about 15,333 days. So around 42 years. That, of course doesn't allow for population growth, but let's assume the cases go up with population growth proportionately.  So that's the outlook in Australia. In 42 years, we might finally move on from covid, based on our current trajectory? What a future to look forward to! Oh, actually, that doesn't include cases prior to today, so maybe we can get out of this thing in closer to 41 years? Life just got a whole lot brighter right then.    
    • Really nice album cover indeed...but ten for me this last while...yawn...as Jez pointed out they all sound the same,i'd have difficulty picking which track came from which album tbh
    • Yeah it starts off very good then tails off round midway...but the defs have potential and judging by the new tunes could fulfil it...fingers crossed
    • And mine still hasn't been sent...quality service right there  too late to get a refund? lol
    • Yeah Badd Boyz is very good,would be my fav of the three...I really like the Platinum Overdose albums but I know where you're coming from,I also prefer their more melodic/glammy/sleazy side to the metal type stuff
    • Here's what it was for me, I mostly voted on familiarity: 1. I'll be honest, I didn't know who either of these singers were.  Of the two I've only heard music from Harem Scarem so it was Hess for me 2. I like Coverdale's voice more than Tyler's 3. I voted Michaels since I've only heard a handful of Enuff Z'nuff songs and I listen to a lot of Poison.  With such a limited sample size this might change when I hear more Z'nuff but for right now it has to be Michaels 4. Haven't heard a lot of Mason so I voted Jani.  As far as I'm concerned Jani is the full package when it comes to singer-songwriters, he's an absolute Legend 5. Of all of these I feel like this is the least fair comparison, they don't sound even remotely alike to me.  While Pearcy isn't a phenomenal vocalist in the traditional sense, he's so much more distinct in my opinion.  I think Phil's voice could get lost in the shuffle, but when Pearcy sings you KNOW it's Pearcy which is arguably more important in some cases 6. Haven't heard Queensryche with La Torre, so Tate it is 7. Bon Jovi is my favorite band of all time, come at me 8. Same with Tate, I've only heard Great White with Russell so Russ it is 9. I like both versions of Danger Danger for different reasons, but I have to go with Poley for this one 10. Haven't heard anything from Heart I don't think, so Elliot all the way 11. Haven't heard much of Cold Sweat or Cathey, but I do love that first Lynch Mob album. Point Logan! 12. Once again had to look these guys up, but this time I've actually heard one full album from each.  I assumed Bulen was Keeling, but that aside this was probably the closest one for me.  Ended up going for Baton Rouge but if you asked me in a few weeks that might change We should do this again sometime, maybe with guitarists/drummers/bassists/etc?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.