Jump to content

Justin Murr's of LNJ statement why the song with Jani Lane is not


Recommended Posts

Justin Murr's of LNJ statement why the song with Jani Lane is not on itunes




First I must say I am sorry for all the confusion about not releasing the new Liberty n' Justice song featuring Jani Lane on itunes on the date stated on our press release (8-15-11). I have read many things about me (both pro & con) and just wanted to clear the air on a few things........

Even before I consider myself a musician or businessman, I am a follower of Christ, a husband, and a father. I have and still do fail at all three of these things miserably at times, but the one thing that holds all three of these together (for me) is love. That brings me up to me wrestling with releasing this song right now. When I woke Tuesday morning I had 322 emails in my inbox, some stating they couldn't wait to hear or they couldn't find it & others condemning me for exploiting Jani. Included in these emails where over 30 requests from radio stations wanting the song to play as soon as I serviced them with the single. The last (for me), were the most convincing and that was from people very close to Jani asking me to wait till at least after the funeral. The one thing that I got from all these emails was love, you his fans loved the artist Jani Lane and the music he created with Warrant and by himself. I with good conscience need to allow his family, friends, and his fans to grief. Once we get past this, we then can celebrate the new music he helped create with Liberty N' Justice. He helped craft the lyrics with Scott Bolan and myself & I do believe it shows where he was at spiritually at the time and should help ease some of the pain of his loss. For now, you can hear a sample of the song "Sin" only at www.melodicrock.com & www.JkNorthrup.com. If you decide to purchase the song please know a portion of the proceeds WILL go to Jani Lane because he helped co-write the song. I am sorry again for not showing more compassion to his family, friends, and fans. Anyone who knows me (really knows me), knows me wanting to release this at this time was not a money motivation but more of a "message" motivation.....soon we will have the official release date so you his fans can hear this amazing song. In closing, I think the chorus of the song suits better then anything I can say....


"let me be the man I could have been / the one you first breathed your life into / my soul in your embrace/ deliver me....deliver me from my sins"


Thanks for your time,


Justin Murr

Liberty n' Justice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see this single delayed.


I still have to wonder if Jani hadn't died... would this have still been a "single" at all. Doubt It. $$$$$$$$$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blah blah blah. fact is, fans wanted this song, just as they wanted other Jani related songs as other songs started shifting on iTunes.

Some money from the single would/will go to Jani's estate, which I am sure will be welcomed by his family once they have had time to grieve.

It's not like this is gonna make anyone a huge amount of cash anyway, so it was just intended as a tribute by a guy who knew him. Plus, considering the recording costs and the costs to put it up on iTunes, that would make any profit pretty much non-existant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have to wonder if Jani hadn't died...would this have still been a "single" at all. Doubt it. $$$$$$$$$$

If, due to Jani's unfortunate and untimely death, copies of "Cherry Pie" were now going for $250 a pop, are you telling me you wouldn't sell your copy in a hot 3 seconds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have to wonder if Jani hadn't died...would this have still been a "single" at all. Doubt it. $$$$$$$$$$

If, due to Jani's unfortunate and untimely death, copies of "Cherry Pie" were now going for $250 a pop, are you telling me you wouldn't sell your copy in a hot 3 seconds?

For the record, I wouldn't unless I had 2 copies. ;) Classic disc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • 2022 HH Donation Drive

    Please support Heavy Harmonies! The donations goal is the out-of-pocket expenses to run the main site and this board for calendar year 2022.

    82% of donation goal reached.
    Donate Sidebar by DevFuse
  • Posts

    • New album released on January 20th. New single "1995" Their last album was awesome and my expectations are high... I really love the new song but especially from 2:35 on the vocals are a bit late... the end of the chorus sounds a little out of tune. I feel like they should take more than just one year for a new album and correct things like that. 
    • Some Black Friday purchases from DDR just rolled in: Alleycat Scratch - Greatest Licks and Nasty Tricks Hung Jury - Screaming In Blue Syre - It Ain't Pretty Being Easy Wild Boyz - Unleashed! And with any luck, I'll have a copy of Blue Blud - The Big Noise arriving sometime before Christmas!
    • I don't know that I really need to add anything to this discussion as most of what I would say has already been said... But you know, there are a lot of promising young bands that Frontiers could be focusing on instead of churning out a new copy and pasted supergroup album every couple of months. The appeal of groups like this is that it isn't supposed to happen very often. When that's all you do, the idea becomes stale and the term "supergroup" loses its meaning.  And thank god I'm not the only one who thinks that project name is awful. 
    • Germany & Begium are and have been poor for a while now. There was no interest in Germany (in general not the die hard fans) as they gave their side no real chance and they were right. Belgium side is too old now. As for US, they have always performed well in major champs. Australia have out performed for sure. But I'll be gobsmacked if Argentina don't despatch them  
    • A Farewell to Arms - TNT
    • Desmond is too busy counting his money of all songs he or co wrote
    • Morocco a real surprise packet. Germany going out in group stages... I think that with big European teams getting beaten by Asian and African teams it has made a lot of the pundits who write off the rest of the world shut up a bit. Soccer is the #4 winter sport in Australia and I think would be the same in USA. Just imagine how good our teams would be if it was #1 like every other country!
    • And in further news... pretty massive story, I reckon. In a nutshell, more than half of all covid fines issued in NSW to be cancelled, including refunds for those already paid, with the possibility that all covid fines could be invalidated by early 2023.  This is obviously a positive step, but what I'd like to see when all the fines are reversed, is that whomever authorised the issuing of all these fines must surely be held accountable. I don't see how something like this can not lead to a conclusion like that... but of course it won't. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-29/revenue-nsw-cancels-33-121-covid-19-fines/101710632 Revenue NSW cancels more than 33,000 COVID-19 fines after Supreme Court hearing By Maryanne Taouk Posted Tue 29 Nov 2022 at 1:09pmTuesday 29 Nov 2022 at 1:09pm, updated Wed 30 Nov 2022 at 9:23amWednesday 30 Nov 2022 at 9:23am The NSW Supreme Court found two COVID-19 fines to be invalid.(ABC News: Bindi Bryce)   The NSW government will withdraw more than 33,000 COVID-19 fines after a Supreme Court hearing on Tuesday. Key points: The fines cancelled are about half of the 62,128 COVID-related infringements issued Revenue NSW says that all sanctions on unpaid fines will now stop They also said the remaining 29,017 fines would still be required to be paid Earlier on Tuesday, Justice Dina Yehia SC was set to hear arguments that two fines for between $1,000 and $3,000, did not meet the requirements of section 20 under the Fines Act. Barrister Katherine Richardson SC said the plaintiffs had in effect been forced to take the "extraordinary step" of going to the Supreme Court after other unsuccessful attempts to have the fines reviewed. "It's only at the eleventh hour the Crown has finally accepted these were invalid," she said. Within a matter of hours the government moved to withdraw more than half the infringements issued under NSW's COVID-19 restrictions. The case centred on the technical basis the notices did not provide a sufficiently detailed description of the offence committed and were therefore invalid. In a statement issued after the ruling, Revenue NSW confirmed it would withdraw 33,121 fines. A total of 62,128 COVID-related infringements were issued in the state throughout the pandemic. "Where fines are withdrawn, all sanctions, including drivers licence restrictions or garnishee order activity will be stopped," the statement read. "Where a fine has been withdrawn and a customer has made a payment — either in part or in full — Revenue NSW will make contact to arrange a refund or credit the payment towards other outstanding debts." a woman standing outside a court room talking Solicitor Samantha Lee called the decision "extraordinary".(Facebook: Redfern Legal Centre) The agency also noted it did "not mean the offences were not committed" and "the remaining 29,017 fines will still be required to be paid if not already resolved". Scott Johnston from Revenue NSW said his decision was made in the interest of being "consistent and equitable", and refunding the close to $10 million that has already being paid, will start immediately. "We'll be working through a process to contact everyone who's either made payments to discuss getting a refund as quickly as possible," Mr Johnston said. "Or to those that haven't resolved those fines, there'll be nothing further for them to do, but we'll advise them as such." About one third of people have already settled their fines, with others making part-payments while about 8,000 fines are overdue, according to Mr Johnston. "We've got everyone's' details who's paid, we'll have to write to everyone to get their details so we can return the money to the right bank account ... we'll also have a hotline. "We're ready to answer the calls that come, customer service is important to us and doing a good and fair job."  a man standing outdoors and in front of microphones speaking to the media Mr Johnston says staff at Revenue NSW are ready to answer queries about people's refunds.(ABC News: Harriet Tatham) Earlier, David Kell SC, representing the NSW Commissioner of Fines Administration, warned the court the two infringements did not meet the act's requirements. Mr Kell said the court should be "cautious" in throwing out the fines, as it would set a precedent in the area. In a statement the Law Society of NSW welcomed the "common sense" decision but urged Revenue NSW to review the remaining COVID-19 related fines — especially any imposed on children.  "Many of the top fifteen per-capita locations where fines were issued during the Delta outbreak have high Aboriginal populations," Law Society president Joanne van der Plaat said. "These include the top three of Walgett, Brewarrina and Wilcannia. Eleven of these communities are counted among communities suffering the state's highest level of social disadvantage." Data reveals NSW COVID fine hotspots A combined total of $3.2 million in fines were issued across Mount Druitt, Liverpool and Dubbo from the start of the pandemic to October last year. Mass cancellation Brendan Beame and Teal Els's court challenge, brought by Redfern Legal Centre, was the catalyst for the mass cancellation. Katherine Richardson SC, said more than 160 people had received an identical $3,000 fine as Ms Els, and more than 500 had fines with similar wording. Ms Richardson said Ms Els had no idea what she was being fined for when she was approached by police while sitting in a park after exercising with her sister. "How can she tell, for example, having no idea what offence she said to have committed with a penalty amount of $3,000, which is obviously a very significant amount of money to be imposed by notice procedure," Ms Richardson told the court. "Our submission states they are entitled to a refund. They have been charged money invalidly and we are pressing for a full range of relief to be sought." In July, Rohan Pank had his fine dismissed for sitting on a park bench in August 2021, during Sydney's lockdown. Redfern Legal Centre represented the three plaintiffs who said they received little information and the fines lacked details about any public health orders breached. The total amount of fines issued during the lockdown amounted to more than $33 million according to Revenue NSW. Most common COVID-19 offences revealed It's New South Wales's COVID-19 lockdown like you've never seen it before, a story not told by the number of cases, vaccines or venues of concern, but a new metric: fines. Sydney faced a 107-day lockdown in mid to late 2021 as the Delta and Omicron waves spread through the city. There were also 12 local government areas in Western Sydney that faced harsher lockdown restrictions including a nightly curfew.  Outside court, Redfern Legal Centre's acting principal solicitor Samantha Lee said it was an "extraordinary" day for NSW. "The state has conceded that the COVID fines brought to the court today are invalid," she said. "We are going to ask the commissioner of fines to set up a mechanism to give the money back. They have no other means than to withdraw those fines. This case has set a precedent." Ms Lee said the decisions today has the potential to invalidate all COVID-19 fines that were issued during the 2020 and 2021 lockdown. Justice Yehia is expected to make a formal judgement in early 2023.
    • Unbelievable...Japan through...they stuck at it...far play to them,and with 20mins to go it looked like Costa Rica were going through also, so Japan v Croatia & Spain v Morocco last 16
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.