Wicked Sensation - Adrenaline Rush

[DeLaCruz]

 

 

Soundclips:

 

Angel In Black

 

King Of The World

 

Misery

I much prefer Bangalore Choir's ''Angel In Black'' thought this might be a cover at first.......

 

 

... and this is a pet hate of mine. If I were a songwriter I would personally NEVER write a song with a title of a song that already existed; if I knew the song I just wrote was going to be inferior to the song already in existence. I just wouldn't do it.

 

So, to take that one step further, to write a song called 'Angel in black,' which is stupidly inferior to a little song of the same title by a band called Bangalore Choir... but then to get the vocalist of the original song to sing your crabby version of the song with the same title??? Madness!!! I don't understand it. You're basically forcing the listener to compare the two, and it makes the new song sound even worse than it probably is.

 

Anyway, rant over. There should be a worldwide registry of taken song titles. If you can't better what is already used, call your crappy song something else.

 

haha, that's gold Geoff!! went and listened to the previews of this album after seeing this thread because I like reece as a vocalist. unfortunately this is too ''heavy metal'' (the kind of heavy metal I dislike) for me I would have preferred him singing in a more traditional hard rock setup even if he's done that lots of times before. the idea with the taken song titles is good, also happened in the movie biz quite a few times and I keep asking myself, how much longer can they come up with new movie titles (that don't completely suck or that are ridiculously long or weird haha)??

[Geoff]

 

 

 

Soundclips:

 

Angel In Black

 

King Of The World

 

Misery

I much prefer Bangalore Choir's ''Angel In Black'' thought this might be a cover at first.......

 

 

... and this is a pet hate of mine. If I were a songwriter I would personally NEVER write a song with a title of a song that already existed; if I knew the song I just wrote was going to be inferior to the song already in existence. I just wouldn't do it.

 

So, to take that one step further, to write a song called 'Angel in black,' which is stupidly inferior to a little song of the same title by a band called Bangalore Choir... but then to get the vocalist of the original song to sing your crabby version of the song with the same title??? Madness!!! I don't understand it. You're basically forcing the listener to compare the two, and it makes the new song sound even worse than it probably is.

 

Anyway, rant over. There should be a worldwide registry of taken song titles. If you can't better what is already used, call your crappy song something else.

 

haha, that's gold Geoff!! went and listened to the previews of this album after seeing this thread because I like reece as a vocalist. unfortunately this is too ''heavy metal'' (the kind of heavy metal I dislike) for me I would have preferred him singing in a more traditional hard rock setup even if he's done that lots of times before. the idea with the taken song titles is good, also happened in the movie biz quite a few times and I keep asking myself, how much longer can they come up with new movie titles (that don't completely suck or that are ridiculously long or weird haha)??

 

 

Yeah, to be honest, this band has a kind of rocky history. They have 4 albums now with 4 different vocalists!!!

 

But anyway, they did release one really great disc, especially if you're a fan of Victory. Their 2nd disc, 'Exceptional' featured Fernando Garcia of Victory fame on vocals, and is BY FAR the best in their discography. Before you write the band off for good, check that disc out. It's a good'un.